Choosing between the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17 is a common dilemma for both seasoned firearm enthusiasts and newcomers alike. Both pistols are incredibly popular, renowned for their reliability and performance, but they cater to slightly different preferences and needs. This in-depth comparison will analyze key features, helping you make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.
Key Differences: A Side-by-Side Look
| Feature | Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 | Glock 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Caliber | 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP | 9mm, .40 S&W, .357 SIG, .45 GAP |
| Grip | Interchangeable backstraps, textured | Aggressive stippling |
| Trigger | Customizable, improved over Gen 1 | Consistent, somewhat heavier pull |
| Slide | Slightly more aggressive serrations | Traditional serrations |
| Weight | Slightly heavier (depending on model) | Slightly lighter |
| Price | Generally comparable | Generally comparable |
| Ambidextrous Features | Ambidextrous slide release & magazine release | Ambidextrous magazine release only |
Detailed Feature Breakdown
Ergonomics and Grip: Comfort and Control
The M&P 2.0 boasts a significant advantage in ergonomics. Its interchangeable backstraps allow for a customized fit, ensuring a comfortable and secure grip for a wide range of hand sizes. The textured grip provides excellent control, even in wet or sweaty conditions. The Glock 17, while featuring aggressive stippling, might feel less comfortable for shooters with smaller hands or those preferring a less aggressive texture.
Trigger: Feel and Accuracy
The M&P 2.0's trigger is generally considered superior to the Glock 17's. It offers a cleaner, crisper break and is more customizable, further enhancing accuracy and control. The Glock's trigger, while reliable, often features a somewhat heavier and less refined pull. However, Glock's trigger consistency is a highly valued characteristic for many users.
Features and Accessories: Expanding Capabilities
Both pistols offer a wide array of aftermarket accessories, from holsters and sights to extended magazines and trigger upgrades. However, the sheer volume of aftermarket support for the Glock 17 is arguably larger, offering greater flexibility in customization options.
Reliability and Durability: Proven Performance
Both the M&P 2.0 and Glock 17 are renowned for their reliability and durability. They are both capable of withstanding harsh conditions and delivering consistent performance. Choosing between them based solely on reliability is unlikely to reveal a clear winner; both platforms have proven their worth over decades of use.
M&P 2.0 Ideal Use Cases:
- Concealed Carry: The customizable grip and improved trigger make the M&P 2.0 a comfortable and accurate choice for everyday carry.
- Home Defense: Its reliability and stopping power make it a formidable home defense weapon.
- Law Enforcement: Its features and modularity make it suitable for law enforcement applications.
Glock 17 Ideal Use Cases:
- Competition Shooting: Its lighter weight and consistent trigger pull are favored by some competitive shooters.
- Duty Weapon: Its reputation for reliability and ease of maintenance makes it a popular choice for duty use.
- First-Time Gun Owners: Its simplicity and widespread availability make it a good choice for first-time gun owners.
Conclusion: The Right Choice for You
The best choice between the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17 ultimately depends on individual preferences and intended use. The M&P 2.0 excels in ergonomics and trigger feel, offering a more customizable and comfortable shooting experience. The Glock 17 prioritizes simplicity, reliability, and a vast aftermarket support system. Consider handling both pistols if possible before making a decision to ensure the best fit for your hand and shooting style. Remember to always prioritize safety and follow all applicable laws and regulations when handling firearms.
